Together, we can save Bushfield! Click here to get involved.

Save
Bushfield Camp

Save Bushfield Camp Save Bushfield Camp Save Bushfield Camp
  • Home
  • Amended Application
  • Explore
  • Get Involved
  • Traffic
  • Nature
  • Landscape
  • Demand
  • Blog
  • About
  • FAQ
  • Donate
  • Inspector MIQ
  • Local Plan
  • More
    • Home
    • Amended Application
    • Explore
    • Get Involved
    • Traffic
    • Nature
    • Landscape
    • Demand
    • Blog
    • About
    • FAQ
    • Donate
    • Inspector MIQ
    • Local Plan

Save
Bushfield Camp

Save Bushfield Camp Save Bushfield Camp Save Bushfield Camp
  • Home
  • Amended Application
  • Explore
  • Get Involved
  • Traffic
  • Nature
  • Landscape
  • Demand
  • Blog
  • About
  • FAQ
  • Donate
  • Inspector MIQ
  • Local Plan

Major Increase in Traffic and Car Dependency

  • The development would bring around 4,500 extra car trips per day, putting more pressure on already busy roads including M3 Junction 11, Bushfield Roundabout and Badger Farm Road.
     
  • Most journeys to the site are expected to be by car (over 70%), showing the scheme is still heavily car-dependent.
     
  • The proposed road changes mainly aim to move more traffic through the area, rather than reduce the number of cars.
     
  • Public transport and cycling improvements appear limited and uncertain, with no strong new alternatives to driving.


  • There are no mitigations for to prevent a huge increase in non-resident within Badger Farm.


  •  M3 Junction 11 would be affected to such an extent that National Highways have still not agreed to the plans.
     
  • The nearby South Winchester Park & Ride already has very little spare capacity, meaning many additional cars may park elsewhere locally.
  • National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF 2025) says transport should be “vision-led”, meaning developments should be designed to reduce reliance on private cars.
     
    • This scheme appears to do the opposite by relying on road expansion and high levels of car travel.
       
  • NPPF Paragraph 116 states development should be refused if the traffic impact would be severe.
     
    • Given the large increase in traffic, this test is a key issue.
       
  • Local Plan Policy WT3 (Bushfield Camp) requires development to:
     
    • minimise reliance on private cars
       
    • make good use of the Park & Ride
       
    • promote sustainable travel.
       
    • The current proposals appear to fall well short of these aims.
       
  • Increased traffic could also raise pollution levels near the River Itchen, which is a protected nature site under the Habitats Regulations 2017.
     
  • The transport strategy for Bushfield is based on accommodating more traffic rather than reducing it.


  • That raises serious questions about whether the development complies with national planning policy, local transport policy, and environmental protections.

ACT NOW:  Object to the amended plans

click here

National Highways are concerned with proposals that may have the potential to impact on the safe and efficient operation of the SRN, in this case the M3.


National Highways

Traffic Maps Showing Regular Congestion

 2023-12-13 at 08.13 

    I want to prevent this unnecessary development, when we already have empty shop space in the town centre and the huge increase in traffic on this side of Winchester where the infrastructure already is inadequate.


    Local resident


    Copyright © 2026 Save Bushfield Camp - All Rights Reserved.

    Powered by

    • Home
    • Explore
    • Get Involved
    • Traffic
    • Nature
    • Landscape
    • Demand
    • Blog
    • About
    • FAQ
    • Donate
    • Inspector MIQ
    • Local Plan

    This website uses cookies.

    We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.

    DeclineAccept